Thinx Lawsuit, Toxic PFAS?

Thinx Lawsuit, Toxic PFAS?

4.9
(710)
Write Review
More
$ 16.00
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

A lawsuit investigation is looking into whether Thinx, Knix and Ruby Love underwear contains toxic chemicals known as PFAS and, if so, whether a class action could help. Learn more here.
provides in-depth lawsuit information, covers the latest class action news, and connects users with attorneys who can help them.

Um, Should I Throw Out My Thinx?! - Betty's Co.

Thinx Settles Lawsuit Alleging Harmful Chemicals In Its Period

Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed, Menstruation

Thinx will cut 95 workers by May 1 following $5M class-action

Period underwear brand Thinx settles class action over 'non-toxic

Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based

Thinx underwear PFAS lawsuit survives bid to dismiss

Here's The Deal With The Thinx Underwear Lawsuit Settlement

Thinx PFAS Lawsuit: Is Period Underwear Safe? : StyleWise

New lawsuit contends period products contain 'forever chemicals

Raincoats Without Toxic PFAS Chemicals Are Coming - Bloomberg

Forever chemicals could be in some 45% of U.S. tap water, USGS

Thinx Class Action Settlement: How to Join

Thinx Reaches PFAs Settlement, 'Mapped' Transparency Tool and More

Thinx period pants lawsuit: do they contain toxic chemicals?